Production of house fly larvae (Musca domestica L.) with different proportion of coffee grounds and hens feces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19230/jonnpr.4036Keywords:
food, temperature, treatment, weightAbstract
Objective. To evaluate the production of larvae of flies in coffee grounds in combination with layer manure at two heights in magentas in a moscario.
Configuration and Design. Completely randomized bifactorial design was established with the following factors: Factor 1 - quantity of substrate (coffee grounds and layer manure, %), Factor 2 - height of the substrate in magenta (three and five, cm). A- coffee grounds 100%; B- layer manure 25% + coffee grounds 75%; C- coffee grounds 50%+ layer manure 50%; D- coffee grounds 75% + layer manure 25%; E- layer manure 100% at three centimeters in height and E, F, G, H, I, J with the same proportions of substrates at five centimeters in height. Each interaction was replicated six times.
Materials and Methods. In each combination the temperatures were measured in substrates and ambient temperature in moscario at morning and afternoon, the quantity and weight of the larvae of flies harvested to the ninth day and their yield; and the presence of Salmonella and faecal coliforms.
Results. The temperature in the substrates (34.50 oC – 37.10 oC). went superior to the ambient (17.80 oC – 34.2 oC) in the whole period. The yield had influenced by the number of larvae, that was bigger for the treatment E and J with 12.302 and 21,756 g kg-1, respectively and not for the weight of the larvae that didn't differ.
Conclusions. The inclusion of coffee grounds in different proportions with the layer manure doesn't facilitate the obtaining of larvae of flies.
Downloads
References
Veldkamp T, Duinkerken G, van Huis A, Iakemond C, Ottevanger E, Bosch G, et al. Insects as a sustainable feed ingredient in pig and poultry diets a feasibility study. Wageningen. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed. 2012; 6 (1): 27-44. doi:10.3920/JIFF2019.0017.
Miller F, Teotia J, Thatcher T. Digestion of poultry manure by Musca domestica. British Poultry Science. 1974; (15): 231. doi:10.1080/00071667408416100
Teotia J, Miller B. Nutritive content of house fly pupae and manure residue. British Poultry Science. 1974; (15):177. doi:10.1080/00071667408416093
Pastor B, Velasquez Y, Gobbi P, Rojo S. Conversion of organic wastes into fly larval biomass: bottlenecks and challenges. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed. 2015; 1(3):179-93. doi.10.3920/JIFF2014.0024
Velmurugu R. Disponibilidad de piensos y nutrición de aves de corral en países en desarrollo. Monogastric Research Centre. 2013:68.
Casanovas E, Rodríguez L. Effect in productive parameters with the inclusion in the diet wheat bran biotransformed by common housefly larvae (Musca domestica L.) REDVET Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria. 2016;17(2):1-12. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa
Ossey Y, Koumi A, Koffi K, Atse B, Kouame L. Use of soybean, bovine brain and maggot as sources of dietary protein in larval Heterobranchus longifilis (Valenciennes, 1840). Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 2012; (15): 2099-2108. http://www.m.elewa.org/JAPS/2012/15.1/Abstract3-atse.html 8. Gandal H, Zannou-Bukaril ET, Kenis M, Chrysostome CAAM, Mensah GA. Potentials of animal, crop and agri-food wastes for the production of fly larvae. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed. 2019; 2(5):59-67. doi:10.3920/JIFF2017.0064
van Huis A. Insects as food and feed, a new emerging agricultural sector: a review. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed. 2020;6(1):27-44. doi:10.3920/JIFF2019.0017
10.Gonçalves S. Gestão de Resíduos Orgânicos. 2005: 104. http://www.cothn.pt/files/38_Manual_II_45caf38667693.pdf
Campos R, Loarca G, Piña H, Vergara B, Oomah B. Spent coffee grounds: A review on current research and future prospects. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2015;45(1):24-36. doi:10.1016/jtifs.2015.04.012
Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs-Horizontal — Method for the Detection of Salmonella spp — Reference Method (ISO 6579:2002, IDT2008).2008.
Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs-Horizontal — Horizontal Method for the enumeration of coliforms — Colony Count technique (ISO 4832:2006, IDT).2010.
Floate K, Lysyk T, Gibson G. Haematobia irrintans L., Horn fly, Musca domestica L., House fly, and Stomoxys calcitrans (L.), stable fly (Dyptera: Muscidae). Biological Control Programmes in Canada 2001 – 2012. Canada: CABI; 2013. p. 182. doi:10.1079/9781780642574.0000
Cicková H, Pastor B, Kozánek M, Martínez-Sánchez A, Rojo S, Takác P. Biodegradation of pig manure by the housefly, Musca domestica: a viable ecological strategy for pig manure management. PloS ONE. 2012;7(e32798). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032798
Pastor B, Velasquez Y, Gobbi P, Rojo S. Conversion of organic wastes into fly larval biomass: bottlenecks and challenges. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed. 2015;1(3):179-93. doi:10.3920/JIFF2014.0024
Miranda C, Tomberlin J. Life-history traits of the housefly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae), reared on three manure types. The 2nd International Conference ‘Insects to Feed the World’ (IFW 2018) 2018:34. doi:10.3920/JIFF2018.S1
Cruz Weigert S, Chim Figueiredo M, Leobmann D, Reis Nunes J, Garcia dos Santo A. Influencia da Temperatura e do Tipo de Sustrato na Producao de Larvas de Musca Domestica Linnaeus, 1758 (Diptera, Mucidae). r Brasileña de Zootecnia. 2002:1886-1889. doi:10.1590/S1516-35982002000800003
Gállego J. Manual de parasitología: morfología y biología de los parásitos de interés sanitario. 2006. Universidad de Barcelona: 403-494.
Escolástico C, Cabildo M, Claramunt R. Organismos y poblaciones. Madrid: UNED; 2013. www.books.google.com
Márquez D. Nuevas tendencias para el control de los parásitos de bovinos en Colombia. Una estrategia sostenible para el siglo XXI. CORPOICA. 2003. p. 167.
García Nava J. Actividad Entomopatógena de Bacillus thuringiensis sobre las diversas fases de la larva de Mosca Doméstica (Musca domestica. L).: Universidad de Colima; 1988.
Koné N, Sylla M, Nacambo S, Kenis M. Production of house fly larvae for animal feed through natural oviposition. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed. 2017; (3):177-86. doi:10.3920/JIFF2018.S1
Casanovas E, Rodríguez L. Production of house fly larvae (Musca domestica L.) with different proportion of filter cake and pig manure. Agroecosistemas. 2020; 8 (2):132-139.
Lago R, Antoniassi R, Freitas S. Composição centesimal e de aminoácidos de café verde, torrado e de borra de café solúvel. II Simpósio de Pesquisa dos Café do Brasil. 2000:1473-1478. http://www.sapc.embrapa.br/arquivos/consorcio/spcb_anais/simposio2/industria09.pdf
Acevedo F, Rubilar M, Scheuermann E, Cancino B, Uquiche E, Gracés M, et al. Spent Coffee Grounds as a Renewable Source of Bioactive Compounds. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy. 2013; 7:420-428. doi:10.1166/jbmb.2013.1369
Urribarrí A, Zabala A, Sánchez J, Arenas E, Chandler C, Rincón M, et al. Evaluación del potencial de la borra de café como materia prima para la producción de biodiesel. Multiciencias. 2014:129-139. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=90432601006
Yongjun C, Jong-su R, Youngjun N, Sang R. Effects of dietary fermented spent coffee ground on nutrient digestibility and nitrogen utilization in sheep. Asian-Australasian Journal of Anim Sciences. 2018;31(3):363-368. doi:10.5713/ajas.17.0654
Nathanson JA. Caffeine and related methylxanthines: possible naturally occurring. Science. 1984;226(4671):184-187. doi:10.1126/science.6207592
Martínez-Alba AS, Arriola-Mosqueda LA, Angel Sahagún CA. Inhibición de la formación de pupas de Musca domestica L. por Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin nativa del estado de Guanajuato. Jovenes en la Ciencia. 2015;1(2):29-32.
PROteINSECT. Insect Protein-Feed for the Future. Adressing the need for feeds for the future today. 2016.
Published
Issue
Section
License
All accepted originals remain the property of JONNPR. In the event of publication, the authors exclusively transfer their rights of reproduction, distribution, translation and public communication (by any sound, audiovisual or electronic medium or format) of their work. To do so, the authors shall sign a letter transferring these rights when sending the paper via the online manuscript management system.
The articles published in the journal are freely used under the terms of the Creative Commons BY NC SA license, therefore.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
