No se ha encontrado relación entre el Umbral de la Sensibilidad y el cuestionario FHSQ en personas con Diabetes Mellitus tipo 2

Francisco Javier Domínguez-Muñoz; Miguel Ángel Hernández-Mocholí; Santos Villafaina; Daniel Collado-Mateo; José Carmelo Adsuar; Narcís Gusi

doi:10.19230/jonnpr.3557

Authors

Francisco Javier Domínguez-Muñoz Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte. Universidad de Extremadura, España
Miguel Ángel Hernández-Mocholí Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte. Universidad de Extremadura, España
Santos Villafaina Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte. Universidad de Extremadura, España
Daniel Collado-Mateo Centro de Estudios Deportivos, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28943 Madrid, España.
José Carmelo Adsuar Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte. Universidad de Extremadura, España
Narcís Gusi Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte. Universidad de Extremadura, España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19230/jonnpr.3557

Keywords:

Diabetes, Sensitivity Threshold, FHSQ, Foot Health

Abstract

Aims. The purpose of this study is to determine the correlation between the Peripheral Vibration Sensitivity Threshold (PVST) and the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ).

Settings and Design. A descriptive cross-sectional study (ISRCTN16866781).

Methods and Material. A total of 88 people with DM type 2 were included in the statistical analysis, 55 men and 33 women. Both groups were evaluated the PVST through the Vibratron II Biotensiometer and the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ).

Statistical analysis used. To check that the groups were comparable at the baseline in terms of participant characteristics and gender, were carried out a T-test for independent samples and a U-Mann Whitney analysis. To establish the degree of correlation between the 8 dimensions of the FHSQ questionnaire and the PVST, the Spearman correlation coefficient was used, given that the scores of the 8 dimensions of the FHSQ followed a non-parametric distribution. To reduce the probability of committing a type I error, since it is a multiple correlation, the Bonferroni correction has been applied, establishing the significance level at p<.006.

Results. There is no statistically significant association between the PVST and the dimensions of the FHSQ, after applying Bonferroni's correction.

Conclusions. In this study no statistically significant association was found, after the application of Bonferroni's correction, between the recording of the Peripheral Vibration Sensitivity Threshold test and the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alam U, Asghar O, Azmi S, Malik RA. General aspects of diabetes mellitus. In: Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Elsevier B.V., 2014: 211–22.

Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2017; 128: 40–50.

Valdés S, Rojo-Martínez G, Soriguer F. Evolución de la prevalencia de la diabetes tipo 2 en población adulta Española. Med. Clin. (Barc). 2007; 129: 352–5.

Antonio JA, Samur A, Rodríguez MZ, Olmos AI, Bárcena DG. Prevalencia de neuropatía periférica en diabetes mellitus. Acta Médica Grup Ángeles 2006; 4: 13.

Alberti KGMM, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med 1998; 15: 539–53.

Gómez Hoyos E, Levy AE, Díaz Perez A, Cuesta Hernández M, Montañez Zorrilla C, Calle Pascual AL. Pie diabético. Semin. la Fund. Esp. Reumatol. 2012; 13: 119–29.

Boulton AJM, Malik RA, Arezzo JC, Sosenko JM. Diabetic somatic neuropathies. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27: 1458– 86.

Hernández-Mocholi MA, Adsuar JC, Davila Romero C, Prieto Prieto J, Domínguez-Munoz FJ, Olivares PR. Fiabilidad test-retest del umbral de sensibilidad a la vibración periférica en los pacientes con dolor crónico de espalda baja. Rehabilitacion 2013; 47:82–9.

Del Pozo-Cruz B, Hernández Mocholí MA, Adsuar JC, Parraca JA, Muro I, Gusi N. Effects of whole body vibration therapy on main outcome measures for chronic nonspecific low back pain: A singleblind randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 2011;43: 689–94.

Hernandez-Mocholi MA, Dominguez-Muñoz FJ, Corzo H, Silva SC, Adsuar JC, Gusi N. Whole body vibration training improves vibration perception threshold in healthy young adults: A randomized clinical trial pilot study. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2016;16: 12–7.

Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Wearing S, Baglioni T. Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1998;88: 419–28.

Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Dunne MP. Health-related quality of life following podiatric surgery. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2001; 91: 164–73.

Landorf KB, Keenan AM, Herbert RD. Effectiveness of foot orthoses to treat plantar fasciiti:s A randomized trial. Arch. Intern. Med. 2006; 166: 1305–10.

Landorf KB, Keenan AM. An evaluation of two foot-specific, health-related quality-of-life measuring instruments. Foot Ankle Int 2002; 23: 538–46.

Dunn JE, Link CL, Felson DT, Crincoli MG, Keysor JJ, McKinlay JB. Prevalence of Food and Ankle Conditions in a Multiethnic Community Sample of Older Adults. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159: 491–8.

Burns J, Wegener C, Begg L, Vicaretti M, Fletcher J. Randomized trial of custom orthoses and footwear on foot pain and plantar pressure in diabetic peripheral arterial disease. Diabet Med 2009; 26: 893–9.

Palomo-López P, Losa-Iglesias ME, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, et al. Specific foot health-related quality-of- life impairment in patients with type II versus type I diabetes. Int Wound J 2019; 16: 47–51.

Asuero AG, Sayago A, Gonzalez AG. The correlation coefficient: An overview. Crit Rev Anal Chem 2006; 36: 41– 59.

Sirera-Vercher MJ, Sáez-Zamora P, Sanz-Amaro MD. Traducción y adaptación transcultural al castellano y al valenciano del Foot Health Status Questionnaire. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 2010; 54: 211–9.

Cuesta-Vargas A, Bennett P, Jimenez-Cebrian AM, Labajos-Manzanares MT. The psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire. Qual Life Res 2013; 22: 1739–43.

Deng H, He F, Zhang S, Calleman CJ, Costa LG. Quantitative measurements of vibration threshold in healthy adults and acrylamide workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1993; 65: 53–6.

Munro B. Statistical methods for health care research. Fourth Edition. 2013.

Maiya AG, Parameshwar A, Hande M, Nandalike V. Relationship Between Glycated Hemoglobin and Vibration Perception Threshold in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2019; : 1534734619882173.

Kallampallil J, Goodwin S, Riddle M. The relationship of vibration perception threshold with metabolic control and duration of disease in British children with type 1 diabetes. In: 42nd Meeting of the British Society for Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes. BioScientifica, 2014.

de Mettelinge TR, Calders P, Palmans T, Vanden Bossche L, Van den Noortgate N, Cambier D. Vibration perception threshold in relation to postural control and fall risk assessment in elderly. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 35: 1712–7.

Palomo-López P, López-López D, Becerro-De-Bengoa-Vallejo R, et al. Concurrent validity of the foot health status questionnaire and study short form 36 for measuring the health-related quality of life in patients with foot problems. Med 2019; 55. DOI:10.3390/medicina55110750.

López-López D, Becerro-De-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Losa-Iglesias ME, et al. Evaluation of foot health related quality of life in individuals with foot problems by gender: A crosssectional comparative analysis study. BMJ Open 2018; 8. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023980.