Correlation between clinical evaluations with imaging classifications in cases with craniopharyngioma: “Hermanos Ameijeiras” Hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19230/jonnpr.3418Keywords:
craniopharyngioma, computerized axial tomography, nuclear magnetic resonanceAbstract
Objectives. To determine the correlation between the clinical evaluations of the pituitary and hypothalamic status with the imaging classifications of Kassam and Puget.
Material and methods. A study was carried out with a descriptive, correlational and retrospective design; with a convenience sample of a population (N = 1567) diagnosed with intracranial tumors by the Neurosurgery Service of the "Hermanos Ameijeiras" Hospital from January 2014 to December 2018. The variables age, sex, clinical manifestations, tumor location were included, hypothalamic status, pituitary status, imaging characteristics, hypothalamic involvement and relationship with the pituitary stem.
Principal results. The results were collected by a questionnaire; then it was compared by theoretical and statistical methods, systematizing the information using the InfoStat / L package for Windows. Forty-four cases were included, with a mean age of 32 ± 15.8 years, predominantly females (61.4%). The most common clinical manifestations were headache (88.6%) and visual disorders (77.2%), with lesions larger than 2 cm in diameter with suprasellar location (75.1%), hypothalamic status Grade II (45.5%) and Grade IV pituitary status (38.6%) all with enhanced contrast administration. The most significant association was demonstrated between pituitary and hypothalamic status (r = 0.61, p = <0.0001) and Puget classification (r= 0.31, p = 0.0382).
Conclusions. The craniopharyngioma predominated in women in his second decade of life, with symptoms headache and visual disorders. The most common location at the region supraselar with presence of cysts, calcification and luster after the administration of contrast for techniques Computerized Axial Tomography and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. The most significant correlation was demonstrated between the pituitary status with Puget's and the hipotalámico's classification.
Downloads
References
Yang I, Sughrue ME, Rutkowski MJ, Kaur R, Ivan ME, Aranda D et al. Craniopharyngioma: a comparison of tumor control with various treatment strategies. Neurosurg Focus. 2012; 28(6): p. 312-34. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/20367362/
Baskin DS, Wilson CB. Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas. A review of 74 cases. J Neurosurg. 1982; 6(5): p. 22-27. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/3712025
Müller H, al e. Craniopharyngioma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019; 75(5). Disponible en: https://doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0125-9
López-Arbolay O, Lobaina Ortiz M, Ortiz Machín M. Craneofaringiomas. Riesgos y desafios del Abordaje Endonasal Endoscópico Extendido a la Base del Cráneo. Rev Chil Neurocir. 2014; 40: p. 12-17.
Campbell PG, McGettigan B, Luginbuhl A, Yadla S, Rosen M, Evans JJ. Endocrinological and ophtalmological consequences of an initial endonasal endoscopic approach for resection of craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2010; 28(4). Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/20367365
Puget S, Garnett M, Wray A. Pediatric craniopharyngiomas: classification and treatment according to the degree of hypothalamic involvement. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2007; 106 (6 suppl): p.517-19. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/1723330
Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, L CR, Mintz AH, Prevedello DM. Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasalapproach for theresection of midline suprasellarcraniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg. 2008; 108. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/18377251
Bunin G, Surawicz T, Witman P, Preston-Martin S, Davis F, Bruner J. The descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngioma. Neurosurg Focus. 1999; 89(43): p. 547-51. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/10223471
Salva Camaño S, Ávila Estévez M, Martínez Suárez JE, Camblor San Juan L. Cirugía estereotáxica en los craneofaringiomas, 13 años de experiencia. Revista Neurología, Neurocirugía y Psiquiatría. 2005; 38(3), 87-92.
Asano A, Kubo O, Tajika Y, Huang M, Takakuta K, Ebina K. Expression and role of cadherins in astrocytic tumors. Brain ThumorPatol. 1997; 14(1): p. 27-33.
Barloon T, Yuh W, Sato Y, Sickels W. Frontal lobe implantation of craniopharyngioma by repeated needle aspirations. AJNR. 1988; 9(2): p. 406-07.
Erfurth EM, Holmer H, Fjalldal SB. Mortality and morbidity in adult craniopharyngioma. Pituitary. 2013; 16(1): p. 55-46.
Ortiz M, López O. Tratamiento Quirúrgico Endonasal Endoscópico en los pacientes con Craneofaringiomas. Tesis de Terminación de la Especialidad. La Habana: Universidad de Ciencias Médicas; 2013.
Páramo Fernández C, Picó Alfonso A, Del Pozo Picó C, Varela Da Costa C, Lucas Morante T, Catalá Bauset M, et al. Guía Clínica del Diagnóstico y Tratamiento de Craneofaringioma y otras lesiones Paraselares. Endocrinología y Nutrición. 2007;54(1): p. 13-22.
Jeswani S, Nuño M, Wu A, Bonert V, Carmichael JD, BlacK KL, Chu R, et al. Comparative analysis of autcomes following craniotomy and expanded endoscopic endonasal transphenoidal resection of craniopharingioma and related tumor: a single–institution. J Neurosurgery. 2016; 124(3): p. 627-638
Tena-Suck ML, Moreno-Reyes IM, Rembao D, Vega R, Moreno-Jiménez S, Castillejos-López MdJ, et al. Craneofaringioma, estudio clínico-patológico. Quince años del Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía “Manuel Velasco Suárez”. Gaceta Médica de México. 2009; 145(5): p. 361-68.
Elliott RE, Sands SA, Strom RG, Wisoff JH. Craniopharyngioma. Clinical Status Scale: astandardized metric of preoperative function and posttreatment outcome. Neurosurg Focus. 2010; 28(4): p. 121-32.
Hoffmann A, Boekhoff S, Gebhardt U, Sterkenburg AS, Daubenbuchel A, Eveslage M, et al. History before diagnosis in childhood craniopharyngioma: associations with initial presentation and long-term prognosis. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2015; 17(3):p. 853-62.
Elowe-Gruau E, Beltrand J, Brauner R, Pinto Samara-Boustani G, Thalassinos C, Busiah K. Childhood Craniopharyngioma: Hypothalamus-Sparing Surgery Decreases the Risk of Obesity.Endocrine Care. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 98(6): p. 2376–82.
Jobnsen D. MR Imaging of the Sellar and Juxtasellar. RadioGraph. 1991; 11(5): p. 727-58.
Ironside J. Rusell & S Rubinstein's. Pathology of tumors of the Nervous System (6th edition). 1998; 51(11): p. 879. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/500994
Robles Acosta VH, Horta Martínez A, Franco Castellano. Característica por Resonancia Magnética del Craneofaringioma. Experiencia en el Hospital General del centro “La Raza”. Anales Radiología de México. 2008; 7(4): p. 239–45.
Müller HL, Merchant TE, Puget S, Martínez Barbera JP. New outlook on the diagnosis, treatment and follow up of childhood-onset craniopharyngioma. [Internet]. 2017. [citado 2019 Enero 23]. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2016.217
Dinza Cabrejas El, Martínez López JÁ, Pons Porrata LM, García Gómez O. Resonancia magnética en pacientes con tumores más frecuentes en la región selar. Medisan [revista en Internet]. 2017; 21(6): p. 725-730. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/san/v21n6/san13216.pdf.
García Yllán V, García Yllán L, Sifontes Estrada M. Craneofaringioma en la tercera edad. Revista Electrónica Dr. Zoilo E. Marinello Vidaurreta [revista en Internet]. 2014. [citado 2019 Feb 16]; 39(11): p. http://revzoilomarinello.sld.cu/index.php/zmv/article/view/138
Published
Issue
Section
License
All accepted originals remain the property of JONNPR. In the event of publication, the authors exclusively transfer their rights of reproduction, distribution, translation and public communication (by any sound, audiovisual or electronic medium or format) of their work. To do so, the authors shall sign a letter transferring these rights when sending the paper via the online manuscript management system.
The articles published in the journal are freely used under the terms of the Creative Commons BY NC SA license, therefore.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
