Episiotomy rate in active women during pregnancy

Authors

  • Raquel Rodríguez-Blanque Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Departamento de Enfermería. Profesora Sustituta Interina. PHD. Universidad de Granada http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2086-1222
  • Juan Carlos Sánchez-García Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Departamento de Enfermería. Profesor Sustituto Interino. PHD. Universidad de Granada http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4650-2159
  • María José Menor-Rodríguez Directora de Enfermería. PHD. Área Sanitaria de Ourense
  • Ana María Núñez-Negrillo Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Departamento de Enfermería. Profesora Ayudante Doctor. PHD. Universidad de Granada http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1377-8140
  • Antonio Manuel Sánchez-López Departamento de Teoría e Historia de la Educación y Pedagogía Social. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación. PHD. Universidad de Sevilla http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3376-2821
  • María José Aguilar-Cordero Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Departamento de Enfermería. Catedrática. PHD. Universidad de Granada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19230/jonnpr.2239

Keywords:

childbirth, episiotomy, exercise, perineum, pregnant woman

Abstract

Aims: Study the influence of moderate aquatic physical exercise following the SWEP methodology  (Study of Water Exercise Pregnant) on the episiotomy rate.

Methods and Material: Randomized Clinical Trial, with 140 randomized subjects; 129 subjects (Group  of Exercises n = 65, Control Group n = 64) completed the requirements of the study. The study began  in the 20th week of gestation and ended in week 37. The perinatal results were obtained from the  partogram registered in the Paritary Services of the University Hospital Complex of Granada and from  the clinical history of each woman.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the episiotomy rate, although a percentage  difference of 10% lower was observed in active women (45.31% vs. 35.4%).
The weight of the RN remained within the normal weight range in both groups (2,500 g - 4,000 g), for  the GC of 3,460 g (Q1 = 3,207.5 - Q3 = 3,770.0) and for the GE of 3,250 g (Q1 = 2.955.0 - Q3 =  3.572.5) (p = 0.011).
In relation to epidural and subdural anesthesia, there are no statistically significant differences between  both groups, obtaining 85.9% for CG and 72.3% for EG (p = 0.092).

Conclusions: The births of the women who have followed the SWEP methodology have presented a  lower rate of episiotomy, although this has not been statistically significant, which is associated with the  improvement of the abdominal muscles and better control of the musculature of the pelvic floor.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACOG. Physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Committee Opinion No. 650. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:e135-42.

American College of Sports Medicine, Kennye WL, Mahler DA, González del Campo Roman P. Manual ACSM para la valoración y prescripción del ejercicio. Barcelona: Editorial Paidotribo; 1999.

Aguilar Cordero MJ, Sánchez López AM, Rodríguez Blanque R, Noack Segovia JP, Pozo Cano MD, López-Contreras G, et al. [Physical activity by pregnant women and its influence on maternal and foetal parameters; a systematic review]. Nutr Hosp. 2014;30(4):719-26.

Claesson I-M, Klein S, Sydsjö G, Josefsson A. Physical activity and psychological well-being in obese pregnant and postpartum women attending a weight-gain restriction programme. Midwifery. enero de 2014;30(1):11-6.

Sui Z, Turnbull D, Dodd J. Enablers of and barriers to making healthy change during pregnancy in overweight and obese women. Australas Med J. 2013;6(11):565-77.

Colberg SR, Castorino K, Jovanovič L. Prescribing physical activity to prevent and manage gestational diabetes. World J Diabetes. 15 de diciembre de 2013;4(6):256-62.

Calais-Germain B. El periné femenino y el parto. Barcelona: La Liebre De Marzo; 2013. 160 p.

Bø K. Can pelvic floor muscle training prevent and treat pelvic organ prolapse? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(3):263-8.

Thacker SB, Banta HD. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv. junio de 1983;38(6):322-38.

Aguilar-Cordero MJ, Rodríguez-Blanque R, Sánchez-García JC, Sánchez-López AM, Baena-García L, López-Contreras G. Influencia del programa SWEP (Study Water Exercise Pregnant) en los resultados perinatales: protocolo de estudio. Nutr Hosp. 1 de enero de 2016;33(1):162-76.

Rodriguez-Blanque R, Sánchez-García JC, Sánchez-López AM, Mur- Villar N, Aguilar-Cordero MJ. The influence of physical activity in water on sleep quality in pregnant women: A randomised trial. Women Birth [Internet]. 8 de julio de 2017; Disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519216302670

CONSORT Checklist [Internet]. 2017 [citado 1 de febrero de 2017]. Disponible en: http://www.consortstatement.org/checklists/view/32- consorte/66-title

WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [Internet]. 2013 [citado 17 de enero de 2017]. Disponible en: http://www.wma.net/es/30publications/10policies/b3/

Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81.

Sherburn M. Pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy facilitates labour. Aust J Physiother. 2004;50(4):258.

Salvesen KÅ, Stafne SN, Eggebø TM, Mørkved S. Does regular exercise in pregnancy influence duration of labor? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1 de enero de 2014;93(1):73-9.

Molina-Reyes C, Huete-Morales MD, Pérez S, Carlos J, Ortiz-Albarín MD, Jiménez Barragán I, et al. Implantación de una política de episiotomía selectiva en el Hospital de Baza. Resultados materno-fetales. Prog Obstet Ginecol. 2011;101-8.

Herrera B, Gálvez A. Episiotomía selectiva: un cambio en la práctica basado en evidencias. Prog Obstet Ginecol. 1 de enero de 2004;47(9):414-22.

Carvalho CCM de, Souza ASR, Moraes Filho OB. [Prevalence and factors associated with practice of episiotomy at a maternity school in Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil]. Rev Assoc Medica Bras 1992. junio de 2010;56(3):333-9.

Published

2018-01-21