The impactful of a good impact factor

Authors

  • Paloma Celada Departamento de Nutrición y Bromatología I (Nutrición). Facultad de Farmacia. Universidad Complutense. Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19230/jonnpr.1553

Keywords:

Research quality, impact factor, scientific journal

Abstract

This paper ironically analyzes about the impact factor, a quality index that obsesses scientific journals and the authors who risk to in them. It also criticizes why this factor is unfair in assessing the merits of scientific researchs and what it means for researchers and some publishers. Using a humorous touch but also under a very serious scientific point of view, the validity of the impact factor is questioned to define the quality and credibility of a scientific journal.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gil A. Tratado de nutrición. Editorial Médica Panamericana: Buenos Aires; 2017.

Sánchez-Muniz FJ., Bastida S. Y aún dicen que el pescado es caro. JONNPR. 2016; 1(7): 239-243.

Garfield, E. Journal citation reports. Current contents. 1976; 30: 5-20.

Franco-López A., Sanz-Valero J., Culebras JM. El factor de impacto ya no es el patrón oro; la declaración de San Francisco sobre evaluación de la investigación. JONNPR. 2017; 2(5): 173-176.

Published

2017-06-18