The number of supports does not modify the electrical cortical activity during balance tasks

Authors

  • Daniel Collado-Mateo Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Cáceres. Universidad de Extremadura
  • Santos Villafaina Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Cáceres. Universidad de Extremadura
  • Juan Pedro Fuentes Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Cáceres. Universidad de Extremadura
  • Narcis Gusi Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Cáceres. Universidad de Extremadura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19230/jonnpr.1486

Keywords:

Gait, stabilometry, EEG, spectral analysis

Abstract

Aims: The objective was to evaluate the electrical cortical activity during two static and two dynamic tasks, comparing between tasks with single support tasks and tasks with two feet on the platform.

Settings and Design: Sixteen young males participated in this cross-sectional study.

Methods and Material: Electrical cortical activity was assessed using the Enobio device. Two static and two dynamic tasks were performed, all of them on the Biodex Balance System device.

Statistical analysis used: Mean power spectrum for the Alpha band was analyzed. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare tasks with one single support and tasks with the two feet on the platform.

Results: No significant difference was observed when comparing the balance tasks.

Conclusions: The number of supports did not significantly modify the EEG signal in the alpha band. However, cognitive demands in the single support dynamic task seemed to be somewhat higher compared with the rest of the tasks. These results may be relevant to design future programs based on dual task.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Horak FB. Postural orientation and equilibrium: what do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls? Age and ageing. 2006;35 Suppl 2:ii7-ii11.

Boonstra TA, Schouten AC, van der Kooij H. Identification of the contribution of the ankle and hip joints to multisegmental balance control. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2013;10:23.

Fitzpatrick R, Burke D, Gandevia SC. Loop gain of reflexes controlling human standing measured with the use of postural and vestibular disturbances. Journal of neurophysiology. 1996;76(6):3994-4008.

Neubauer AC, Fink A. Fluid intelligence and neural efficiency: effects of task complexity and sex. Personality and Individual Differences. 2003;35(4):811-27.

Babiloni C, Marzano N, Infarinato F, Iacoboni M, Rizza G, Aschieri P, et al. "Neural efficiency" of experts' brain during judgment of actions: a high-resolution EEG study in elite and amateur karate athletes. Behavioural brain research. 2010;207(2):466-75.

Del Percio C, Babiloni C, Marzano N, Iacoboni M, Infarinato F, Vecchio F, et al. "Neural efficiency" of athletes' brain for upright standing: a high-resolution EEG study. Brain research bulletin. 2009;79(3-4):193- 200.

Del Percio C, Rossini PM, Marzano N, Iacoboni M, Infarinato F, Aschieri P, et al. Is there a "neural efficiency" in athletes? A high-resolution EEG study. NeuroImage. 2008;42(4):1544-53.

Costanzo ME, VanMeter JW, Janelle CM, Braun A, Miller MW, Oldham J, et al. Neural Efficiency in Expert Cognitive-Motor Performers During Affective Challenge. Journal of motor behavior. 2016;48(6):573-88.

Ruffini G, Dunne S, Farres E, Cester I, Watts PC, Silva SP, et al. ENOBIO dry electrophysiology electrode; first human trial plus wireless electrode system. Conference proceedings : Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference. 2007;2007:6690-4.

Ruffini G, Dunne S, Farres E, Watts PC, Mendoza E, Silva SR, et al. ENOBIO - first tests of a dry electrophysiology electrode using carbon nanotubes. Conference proceedings : Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference. 2006;1:1826-9.

Collado-Mateo D, Adsuar JC, Olivares PR, Cano-Plasencia R, Gusi N. Using a dry electrode EEG device during balance tasks in healthy young- adult males: Test-retest reliability analysis. Somatosensory & motor research. 2015;32(4):219-26.

Ouchi Y, Okada H, Yoshikawa E, Nobezawa S, Futatsubashi M. Brain activation during maintenance of standing postures in humans. Brain : a journal of neurology. 1999;122 ( Pt 2):329-38.

Tse YY, Petrofsky JS, Berk L, Daher N, Lohman E, Laymon MS, et al. Postural sway and rhythmic electroencephalography analysis of cortical activation during eight balance training tasks. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2013;19:175-86.

Jung TP, Makeig S, Westerfield M, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Sejnowski TJ. Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2000;111(10):1745-58.

Beurskens R, Steinberg F, Antoniewicz F, Wolff W, Granacher U. Neural Correlates of Dual-Task Walking: Effects of Cognitive versus Motor Interference in Young Adults. Neural plasticity. 2016;2016:8032180.

Roland PE, Larsen B, Lassen NA, Skinhoj E. Supplementary motor area and other cortical areas in organization of voluntary movements in man. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1980;43(1):118-36.

Doumas M, Smolders C, Krampe RT. Task prioritization in aging: effects of sensory information on concurrent posture and memory performance. Experimental Brain Research. 2008;187(2):275-81.

Rapp MA, Krampe RT, Baltes PB. Adaptive task prioritization in aging: Selective resource allocation to postural control is preserved in Alzheimer disease. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2006;14(1):52-61.

Falbo S, Condello G, Capranica L, Forte R, Pesce C. Effects of Physical-Cognitive Dual Task Training on Executive Function and Gait Performance in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. BioMed research international. 2016;2016:5812092-.

Published

2017-05-13