On the report of the results of scientific research.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19230/jonnpr.1097Keywords:
-Abstract
-Downloads
References
Artiles Visbal L. El artículo científico. Rev Cubana Medicina General Integral 1995;11(4):387-94.
Tapia Granados JA. Mitos o realidades: A propósito de la publicación de trabajos científicos. Acimed [Cuba]
;4(1):41-6.
Durieux V, Gevenois PA. Bibliometric indicators: Quality measurements of scientific publication. 1. Radiology
;255:342-51.
Garfield E. The ethics of scientific publication (1980). Disponible en:
https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/786203. Fecha de última visita: Lunes, 19 de Septiembre
del 2016.
Garfield E. More on the ethics of scientific publication: Abuses of authorship attribution and citation amnesia
undermine the reward system of science (1982). Disponible en:
https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/794729. Fecha de última visita: Lunes, 19 de Septiembre
del 2016.
Silva Hernández D, Llanes Cuevas R, Rodríguez Silva A. Manifestaciones impropias en la publicación científica.
Rev Cubana Salud Pública 2007;33(4):0-0. Disponible en:
http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-34662007000400009. Fecha de última visita: Lunes,
de Septiembre del 2016.
Bacallao J, Barber A, Roca G. Las conductas impropias en la actividad científica. Rev Cubana Salud Pública
;29(1):61-4.
Laucirica Hernández C. Ética de la publicación científica. Rev Habanera Ciencias Médicas 2007;6:0-0.
Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1729-519X2007000500013. Fecha de
última visita: Lunes, 19 de Septiembre del 2016.
Mayta-Tristán P, Curioso WH. Política editorial ante la detección de una publicación redundante [Editorial]. Rev
Peru Med Exp Salud Pública 2009;26(1):5-8.
Young NS, Ioannidis JP, Al-Ubaydli O. Why current publication practices may distort science. PLoS Med
;5(10):e201. Disponible en: http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0050201.
Fecha de última visita: Lunes, 19 de Septiembre del 2016.
Campanario JM. El sistema de revisión por expertos (peer review): Muchos problemas y pocas soluciones. Serie
Científica 2010;3(11):0-0. Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas de La Habana. Disponible en:
http://publicaciones.uci.cu/index.php/SC/article/download/530/311. Fecha de última visita: Lunes, 19 de
Septiembre del 2016.
Fanelli D. Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics
;90(3):891-904.
Published
Issue
Section
License
All accepted originals remain the property of JONNPR. In the event of publication, the authors exclusively transfer their rights of reproduction, distribution, translation and public communication (by any sound, audiovisual or electronic medium or format) of their work. To do so, the authors shall sign a letter transferring these rights when sending the paper via the online manuscript management system.
The articles published in the journal are freely used under the terms of the Creative Commons BY NC SA license, therefore.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
