• Madjid Eshaghi
  • Zahra Farhad Touski
  • amir rashme


One of the biggest problems of human society is facing crises. Origins of many crises go back to strategy selection in the relations between human beings. In this article, the crises have been discussed, whose origin is relations between human beings. By defining critical points in 2 × 2 games, we provide a mathematical model to detect this type of crises, and then by defining a unique compromise point, we offer solutions for this type of crisis. In many crises such as The Cuban Missile Crisis, Nash equilibrium will not work and leads to the creation of a vacuum in the use of game theory. We believe that what is presented in this article can help fill the void. Fixing the vacuum in game theory and optimal use of compromise and critical points leads to the development of cooperation - cooperation strategy in the world.


La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.


Adami, C. & Hintze, A. (2013). Evolutionary instability of zero – determinant strategies demonstrates that winning is not everything? Nature. 4:2193, 10.1038, ncomms 3193.

Simon, B. (1993). Crisis Management Strategy. NY: Routledge Publication.

Deaton, A. (2003). How to monitor poverty for the millennium development goals. Journal of Human Development. 4, 353-78.

David, F. R. (1999). Strategic Management. 7th. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Frank, C. Z. (2014). A Game Theoretic History of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Economies. 2, 20–44.

Goold, M. & Quinn, J. J. (1990). The Paradox of Strategic Controls. Strategic Management Journal. 11: 43-57.

Hao, D., Rong, Z. & Zhou, T. (2014). Zero-determinant strategy: An underway revolution in game theory. Chin. Phys. B. 23, 078905.

Hauert, C & Schuster, H. G. (1997). Effects of increasing the number of players and memory size in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma: a numerical approach. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 513 – 519.

Hilbe, C., Wu, B., Traulsen, A. & Nowak, M. A. (2015). Evolutionary performance of zero – determinant strategies in multiplayer games. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 374.

Hilbe, C., Traulsen, A. and Sigmund. K. (2015). Partners or rivals? Strategies for the iterated prisoner’s dilemma. Games and Economic Behavior. 92, 41 – 52.

Smith, J. M. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games- Cambridge University Press.

Fuka, J., Volek, J. & Obrsalova, I. (2014). Game Theory as a Tool of Crisis Management in a Company. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economies. 11(1), 250-261.

Fisher, L. (2008). Rock, paper, scissors: game theory in everyday life.

Podimata, M. V. & Ponayotis, C. Y. (2015). Evolution of Game Theory Application in Irrigation Systems. Agriculture and Agricultural Science. 4: 271-281.

Osborne, M. J. (2000). An Introduction to Game Theory. Oxford University Press.

McClure, J. (2006). Guidelines for encouraging householders’ preparation for earthquakes in New Zealand. Report for Building Research.

Pan. L., Hao, D., Rong, Z. & Zhou, T. Zero (2015). Determinant strategies in iterated public goods game. Sci Rep 5: 13096.

Press, W. H. & Dyson, F. J. (2012). Iterated prisoner’s dilemma contains strategies that dominate any evolutionary opponent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 109(26): 10409 – 10413.

Report by Ambassador Gusti Agung Wesaka Puja of Indonasia (2009). The Coordinator for transparency in Armaments in the Conference on Disarmament. Geneva. 10 March.

Deger, S. (1987). Military Expenditure in the Third World Countries, the Economic Effects. London Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Huntington, S. P. (1993). Clash of Civilizations?.Foreign Affairs. 72, 22-49.

Gupta, S., de Mello, L. & Sharan, R. (2001). Corruption and Military Spending. European Journal of Political Economy. 17, 749-777.

Von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. Press (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ.