La publicación no excluyente de resultados de investigación.

Autores/as

  • Ignacio Jáuregui-Lobera Universidad Pablo de Olavide. Sevilla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19230/jonnpr.2016.1.5.1022

Palabras clave:

-

Resumen

-

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Sovacool BK. Exploring scientific misconduct: isolated individuals, impure institutions, or an inevitable idiom of

modern science? J Bioeth Inq 2008;5:271–282.

Steneck NH. Fostering integrity in research: definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Sci Eng Ethics

;12:53–74.

Schulz PC, Katime I. Los fraudes científicos. Rev Iberoam Polim 2003; 4:1-90.

De Vries R, Anderson MS, Martinson BC. Normal misbehaviour: scientists talk about the ethics of research. J

Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2006;1:43–50.

Merton RK.. The Matthew effect in science. Science 1969;159:56-63.

Jiménez Rodríguez J. El efecto Mateo: un concepto psicológico. Papeles del Psicólogo, 2009;30:145-154.

Granqvist E. Why science needs to publish negative results. Innovation in Publishing. March, 2015;Elsevier.

Fanelli D. “Positive” results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS ONE 2010;54:e10068.

Fanelli D. Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics 2012;90:891-

Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey

data. PLoS ONE 2009;45:e5738.

Steneck NH. The role of professional societies in promoting integrity in research. Am J Health Behav

;27:S239–S247.

Archivos adicionales

Publicado

2016-07-21